morgaine
September 23rd, 2008, 11:21 AM
Ok, this thread is going to be all about stimulating the economy....Now, it is my oppinion that compared to 6 months ago the economy is improving. The goal would be to continue improving the economy by using whatever assets we have on hand, not eliminating ...possibly reshaping.
Lately there has been a wide discussion about mish locate bids and how I feel that the locate bids are capable of stimulating the economy. After further thought I'm going to try once more here to balance both sides of the coin, because even my eyes have been opened wider through the previous discussions.
Let me start by saying that it is obvious that mish auctions are helping to stimulate the economy. I understand that we wouldn't want to start removing all of the valuable items from mish auctions because this seems to be the best way to get exciting gear to the active player base.
With private locate bids .... economic stimulation is not occuring until a general private bid has reached a point higher then the current auction value of something that can be netted with that bid....
locate type armor extra met aff dam 2 bid 1005 ... is stimulating the economy more then locate type armor aff dam 1 bid 505, because it does offer a higher price for a 2dmg.... though its still not stimulating the economy to a point that increases the value of 2dmg gear.
locate wear fin wear neck wear head wear legs wear feet wear hands wear arms wear wrist extra met aff dam 3 bid 10500.
the third bid is less general yet still containes a great amount of generality and is getting hte price point to a spot where less valuable gear can be sold at a higher price..... then the people who need that less valuable gear have to pay the higher price in order to recieve it....
the real problem is that
locate type armor aff dam 1 bid 505
(or 16 bids like this)
will eliminate dmg gear from being sold over the mish public auction format.
I'm completeley torn here now, because I have seen the good that the locate bid format can do for the economy in establishing a base value for gear.... but I am all to aware of the inability of the player base to understand the full functions of mish.
lets face it, the undelaying factor to the locate list working as an economical base point is competition from all ... i.e. use of the list, understanding how it works... and then competing to control those general bids that will pan out into more exciting gains. It is only those general bids that inflate the price of dmg gear, forcing the consumer to pay a higher price, but also allowing the realm to sell for a higher price; however, those general bids will only inflate these prices if there is adequate competition for bid control.
If I had to guess, Tynian's issue with understanding my theory is wrapped around this particular quandary.
If the competition on the list does not exist, then we have people receiving gear for bottemed out prices rather then actually inflating prices and stimulating the economy.
Now that I understand this point as well, I absolutely must consider all boundaries, and all options... and figure out where we can stimulate the economy the most, creating competition for both public and private bidders.
I do not believe my previous theories are out of whack, I do believe that they are exactly what used to drive our economy.... however receding player base = less competition, receding knowledge of our broker system = less competition, and less comptetion = a receding economy.
I plan to expand on this, and my previous theory through this thread, after some thought.
-Morgaine
Lately there has been a wide discussion about mish locate bids and how I feel that the locate bids are capable of stimulating the economy. After further thought I'm going to try once more here to balance both sides of the coin, because even my eyes have been opened wider through the previous discussions.
Let me start by saying that it is obvious that mish auctions are helping to stimulate the economy. I understand that we wouldn't want to start removing all of the valuable items from mish auctions because this seems to be the best way to get exciting gear to the active player base.
With private locate bids .... economic stimulation is not occuring until a general private bid has reached a point higher then the current auction value of something that can be netted with that bid....
locate type armor extra met aff dam 2 bid 1005 ... is stimulating the economy more then locate type armor aff dam 1 bid 505, because it does offer a higher price for a 2dmg.... though its still not stimulating the economy to a point that increases the value of 2dmg gear.
locate wear fin wear neck wear head wear legs wear feet wear hands wear arms wear wrist extra met aff dam 3 bid 10500.
the third bid is less general yet still containes a great amount of generality and is getting hte price point to a spot where less valuable gear can be sold at a higher price..... then the people who need that less valuable gear have to pay the higher price in order to recieve it....
the real problem is that
locate type armor aff dam 1 bid 505
(or 16 bids like this)
will eliminate dmg gear from being sold over the mish public auction format.
I'm completeley torn here now, because I have seen the good that the locate bid format can do for the economy in establishing a base value for gear.... but I am all to aware of the inability of the player base to understand the full functions of mish.
lets face it, the undelaying factor to the locate list working as an economical base point is competition from all ... i.e. use of the list, understanding how it works... and then competing to control those general bids that will pan out into more exciting gains. It is only those general bids that inflate the price of dmg gear, forcing the consumer to pay a higher price, but also allowing the realm to sell for a higher price; however, those general bids will only inflate these prices if there is adequate competition for bid control.
If I had to guess, Tynian's issue with understanding my theory is wrapped around this particular quandary.
If the competition on the list does not exist, then we have people receiving gear for bottemed out prices rather then actually inflating prices and stimulating the economy.
Now that I understand this point as well, I absolutely must consider all boundaries, and all options... and figure out where we can stimulate the economy the most, creating competition for both public and private bidders.
I do not believe my previous theories are out of whack, I do believe that they are exactly what used to drive our economy.... however receding player base = less competition, receding knowledge of our broker system = less competition, and less comptetion = a receding economy.
I plan to expand on this, and my previous theory through this thread, after some thought.
-Morgaine